![]() No real way to tell if that is due to the old keyboards being old, or some inherent difference, but it is a real difference. compared to my old units, the new keys feel a little more "poppy", i.e., a little better. S/N is PHA030_ _ _ _, I assume that means made in 2020, week 30? I ordered one from the Walmart seller, it arrived in about 4 days. I have two 35s units from 2007, each with a key or two or three that require extra pressure to register, so I figured I'd go ahead and buy one more, especially if it has been discontinued. Just got mine the other day and it was in perfect condition, including sealed HP theft detection strip still in place. ![]() That's a good $10+ less than the eBay and Amazon prices right now. (10-27-2021 10:57 PM)bbergman Wrote: By the way, there's a Walmart Seller (Photo4Less) that's still selling NIB 35's for $54. Not for monetary benefit or recognition, but just out of love for the product and desire to bring some of the heyday back to a product. Maybe at some point in the future, HP might consider bringing on a couple of part-time contractors (so they're under NDA and copyright limitations) who have a background in embedded code, and who might be willing to take a shot at addressing the most egregious bugs. Oh, as a 30+ year career software engineer, I definitely can appreciate the difficulty in fixing legacy code without documentation! maybe you start to understand the problem/difficulty in fixing things. If you can imagine it, chances are it is part of the issue. :-)Ĭompletely non-documented (at least in anything but sparse chinese) source, non-English tools, extensive regions of assembly using non-standard assembly heavily dependent on non-documented features and registers requiring a close working relationship with the exact chip manufacturer (who doesn't have anyone who understands the chip anymore), no way to flash or change the firmware once flashed, etc ![]() (02-24-2015 02:27 PM)Tim Wessman Wrote: (02-22-2015 07:21 PM)Tugdual Wrote: Using IDA you rapidly accumulate a lot legit 6502 fragments and it doesn't even look like it was compiled from C which I found surprising. I found this note, in another thread, which perhaps implies the source was not at that time lost, but perhaps not very useful: (10-29-2021 05:46 AM)Roberto Volpi Wrote: (10-29-2021 02:52 AM)Nate Wrote: If I remember correctly, the source code was lost. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |